PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Benchmark screenshots for various boosters & machines.
User avatar
TheNameOfTheGame
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:49 pm
Location: Almost Heaven, West Virginia

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by TheNameOfTheGame »

Testing against TOS 1.04 instead of 2.06 is even more impressive.


Without NVDI

pak50mhz_gembench_tos104.jpg
pak50mhz_gembench_tos104.jpg (100.93 KiB) Viewed 3303 times

With NVDI

pak50mhz_gembench_tos104_nvdi.jpg
pak50mhz_gembench_tos104_nvdi.jpg (94.05 KiB) Viewed 3303 times
User avatar
TheNameOfTheGame
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:49 pm
Location: Almost Heaven, West Virginia

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by TheNameOfTheGame »

Darklord wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:39 pm Frank has TT-RAM. Your setup does not, right? Not sure how much of
a difference that will make.

Also, you might want to check the Pak manual but IIRC (big if) the
CPU speed and FPU speed are supposed to be matched.
Yes, I did see that in the manual, thanks. But since my FPU is testing ok, I think it is set up right.

With the new benchmarks run against TOS 1.04, my results are pretty much as good as Frank's so I am pretty sure I am running at 50Mhz.
czietz
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:02 pm

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by czietz »

In my experience, Centbench is better in determining the CPU and FPU speeds than SYSINFO: http://centek.free.fr/atari/softs/s_centbe.htm
User avatar
TheNameOfTheGame
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:49 pm
Location: Almost Heaven, West Virginia

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by TheNameOfTheGame »

czietz wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:27 pm In my experience, Centbench is better in determining the CPU and FPU speeds than SYSINFO: http://centek.free.fr/atari/softs/s_centbe.htm
Oh, thanks, that is fantastic! 50Mhz confirmed. :D

pak50mhz_centbench.jpg
pak50mhz_centbench.jpg (96.07 KiB) Viewed 3288 times
User avatar
Darklord
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:41 pm

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by Darklord »

TheNameOfTheGame wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:51 pm
Yes, I did see that in the manual, thanks. But since my FPU is testing ok, I think it is set up right.

With the new benchmarks run against TOS 1.04, my results are pretty much as good as Frank's so I am pretty sure I am running at 50Mhz.
Oh...I only posted that because I thought you were worried about mislabeled chips from Ebay.

Good to know everything is fine. :)
Welcome To DarkForce! www.darkforce.org "The Fuji Lives.!"
Atari SW/HW based BBS-Telnet:darkforce-bbs.dyndns.org 1040
User avatar
TheNameOfTheGame
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:49 pm
Location: Almost Heaven, West Virginia

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by TheNameOfTheGame »

Darklord wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:21 pm
TheNameOfTheGame wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:51 pm
Yes, I did see that in the manual, thanks. But since my FPU is testing ok, I think it is set up right.

With the new benchmarks run against TOS 1.04, my results are pretty much as good as Frank's so I am pretty sure I am running at 50Mhz.
Oh...I only posted that because I thought you were worried about mislabeled chips from Ebay.

Good to know everything is fine. :)

I appreciate the help for sure. It is always a bit of a gamble buying these parts on ebay. I make sure to check feedback, talk to the seller, try not to buy from Chinese sellers, and don't go for the bargain listings. Not always of course, but you get what you pay for in most cases. :lol:
User avatar
Bikerbob
Posts: 499
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 7:30 pm
Location: Mississauga, ON
Contact:

Re: PAK68/3-030 50Mhz

Post by Bikerbob »

Very cool. Looking forward to getting my PAK(s) back on track. I had to move most of my stuff.. now I cant find my ET4000 for the Panther... grrrr it will surface! :)

James
Post Reply

Return to “BENCHMARKS”