I dont use a fixed memory range. Its done by the OS. Its normally allocated to 0x40000000 - 0x47ffffff.8 Bit Dreams wrote: βWed Jun 17, 2020 11:28 am @terriblefire
What memory range are You using? Should be in $08000000- $0FFFFFFF i think...
TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
βββ
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
- 8 Bit Dreams
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:12 am
- Location: Germany
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Have checked Amiga Memory map, and noticed not all regions are fee to use:
https://www.amigacoding.com/index.php/Amiga_memory_map
If You allocate 128MB in 0x40000000 - 0x47ffffff this will probably not work, since this area is Reserved for motherboard RAM expansion, You need to try from $10000000 then...
If You allocate 128MB in 0x40000000 - 0x47ffffff this will probably not work, since this area is Reserved for motherboard RAM expansion, You need to try from $10000000 then...
Retro computer hardware & repair in Germany
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Like i've said. I'm not allocating the ram there. Its done by Autoconfig. The RAM is given a base address by the operating system. Exactly the same thing happens with the Blizzard and it works.
This is not correct. The range you said and the diagram you posted say its ZIII expansion area. Which is exactly what is happening.8 Bit Dreams wrote: βWed Jun 17, 2020 7:54 pm If You allocate 128MB in 0x40000000 - 0x47ffffff this will probably not work, since this area is Reserved for motherboard RAM expansion, You need to try from $10000000 then...
βββ
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
- 8 Bit Dreams
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:12 am
- Location: Germany
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Ah, ok,
was under impression that this address space is reserved for Motherboard ram, hence it makes trouble if it's more than 64MB...
was under impression that this address space is reserved for Motherboard ram, hence it makes trouble if it's more than 64MB...
Retro computer hardware & repair in Germany
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
No its 0x4000_0000 that we have the board at. The expansion area you are talking about is 0x0400_00008 Bit Dreams wrote: βWed Jun 17, 2020 9:18 pm Ah, ok,
was under impression that this address space is reserved for Motherboard ram, hence it makes trouble if it's more than 64MB...
βββ
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Ok I have not had time to muck about with this in the last couple of days, anyways, I realized like the dumbass that I am that I had not got the 060 lib installed on my own OS_39..Doh
So I dropped the 060 into libs took the 040 one out and yatzi bingo, its now seeing and working fine on my CD32 with 128mb and a Dual OS, on which I have installed OS 39 and OS 3.1 ( I just use HDtoolbox to swap the sys boot to which one I want to use ), oh this was using a Kingston 8gb CF with PFSaio filesytem
I can`t try the A1200 till tomorrow will report back then
So I dropped the 060 into libs took the 040 one out and yatzi bingo, its now seeing and working fine on my CD32 with 128mb and a Dual OS, on which I have installed OS 39 and OS 3.1 ( I just use HDtoolbox to swap the sys boot to which one I want to use ), oh this was using a Kingston 8gb CF with PFSaio filesytem
I can`t try the A1200 till tomorrow will report back then
- Attachments
-
- CD32 TF360 OS39 128mb.jpg (213.89 KiB) Viewed 4512 times
- 8 Bit Dreams
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:12 am
- Location: Germany
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Fantastic news bud! βΊ
And yes, 060 libs are indeed needed
And yes, 060 libs are indeed needed
Retro computer hardware & repair in Germany
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Mine has MMUlib in it and it made no difference. :/8 Bit Dreams wrote: βSun Jun 21, 2020 6:53 pm Fantastic news bud! βΊ
And yes, 060 libs are indeed needed
βββ
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
Just got an email from @chucky trying out @supaduper's latest image.
unfortunally this image doesnt contain updates.. like updated exec.library. thats why it works
βββ
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
Re: TF1260 / TF360 Weirdness with OS3.9 (AKA Why i'm not releasing them just yet)
So when you say updates you mean BB2 updates?terriblefire wrote: βSun Jun 21, 2020 8:18 pm Just got an email from @chucky trying out @supaduper's latest image.
unfortunally this image doesnt contain updates.. like updated exec.library. thats why it works
And still the puzzle is that your test OS39 does work on mine all very puzzling