No, no blitter.
By the way, I'm not sure why you have a heatsink on the 68030 as it hardly gets warm.
No, no blitter.
Ah, brilliant. Many thanks. I'll use that as my standard reference, then.
Mine does get warm and will crash without it.stephen_usher wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:52 pmNo, no blitter.
By the way, I'm not sure why you have a heatsink on the 68030 as it hardly gets warm.
Those figures look wonky, @stephen_usher .stephen_usher wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:50 pm True for the GEM part as the AES is faster in TOS 2.06 but not the raw CPU.
As you can see it was 880% stock STFM in that benchmark and after the firmware update it dropped to 606%.
Yep. @stephen_usher your using a really old build of GB6. The tests themselves could may well be different under the hood. Alt-ram benchmarks were only added in much later builds. So 0% is being taken into account on the overall scores as BW says.
Completely agree @exxos. I have seen this a lot on many forums, that the reference (test) file being used is often different so results are not comparable, like comparing apples to oranges.
Yeah, I think with GB6 having so many ways of doing things, people are mixing it all up. Technically "stock" should be TOS104 no blitter, or TOS104 with blitter.. but results can differ because of TOS version... I am tending to use the STE with TOS206 with blitter on as the main reference file. But it really depends on what the user wants to compare against vs what machine. I think some think "load GB6 and run it - job done" , but GB6 doesn't work like that.. thats just a bad habit from GB4 days which didn't have any proper references to start with.