Terriblefire Accelerators

Help & news on accelerators from TF, Amiga, Atari, CD32 etc

Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator

terriblefire
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 4460
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: Terriblefire Accelerators

Post by terriblefire » Wed Aug 21, 2019 7:50 pm

GadgetUK164 wrote:
Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:00 am
LOL! It wasn't Hans Campbell by any chance was it?
I think it might have been.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."

User avatar
GadgetUK164
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:26 pm

Re: Terriblefire Accelerators

Post by GadgetUK164 » Fri Aug 23, 2019 3:02 pm

terriblefire wrote:
Wed Aug 21, 2019 7:50 pm
GadgetUK164 wrote:
Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:00 am
LOL! It wasn't Hans Campbell by any chance was it?
I think it might have been.
If not it sounds like his clone! A few times he's posted shit like that on my videos - one time claiming I was using inferior turned pin sockets when the professional choice is dual wipe sockets - apparently turned pin sockets are only for use with mods! He professes to be expert when in reality the guy hasn't got a clue!
My YouTube Channel - www.youtube.com/GadgetUK164

Lukya
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:28 am

Re: Terriblefire Accelerators

Post by Lukya » Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:42 pm

Looking forward to following your stuff here Stephen. You're a bloomin folk hero to us old Amigans...:-)

hammer
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 12:44 pm

Re: Terriblefire Accelerators

Post by hammer » Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:37 pm

alenppc wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:01 pm
terriblefire wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:25 pm
Recently I was attacked (I’m a total dipsh*t) for using “low quality” SMD rather than high quality “through hole”... just one example of the type of bullying I get where people want me to change what I do so they get what they want.
Firstly, ignore this nonsense, or eventually, troll them back and say "changing the 68030 to a QFP package" so there is even less through-hole shit there :P
high quality “through hole”.... LOL

My ASUS ROG X570 (with the latest and fastest PCI-E version 4.0) motherboard has both through-hole and surface mounted(SMD) components.

My A1200's 68EC020 is surface mounted and it still works.

I don't understand the logic from these trolls.

I spotted TF534 with 4MB RAM which is not desirable and I just ignore the product until I encounter a product that suites my requirements. If there's a discussion about pros and cons with TF534, then I put my 2 cents in. Personal attacks are bad.

TF536 is nice, but the Pentium class 68060 or Vampire 68080 has my $$$$ interest. I can source 68060 CPU, but I don't have accel card to go with it.

Post Reply

Return to “Terriblefire's channel”